Book Review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court - In the past, when I started to start blogging, many thoughts disturbed me. I want to have a blog with a nice and interesting look. I am constantly looking for basic tutorials from some web and blogs on the internet. And thankfully, one by one I started to do it, and of course have to go through some confusion process first, but the most important of a blog that is content, yes on the blog
Innaz Review we will discuss a lot of information about gadgets that are very in need by you, now we will discuss first about Book Review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court please refer to the information we will convey until completion:
Articles :
Book Review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court
full Link :
Book Review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court
Article book review,
Article unitary patent,
Article upc,
You can also see our article on:
Book Review: European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court
There is a perverse incentive in research that it is not in a scholar's interests for a problem to be solved. If your pet problem is solved, what do you do next? Therefore, publishing a UK book on European patent litigation in the year of the Brexit vote can be surprisingly fortuitous and lead to interesting reading. Brexit adds an (un)expected plot twist to the development of European patent litigation, and
Luke McDonagh's new book is possibly the prequel to whatever-comes-next.
The book has three main chapters; one chapter looks at European patent litigation under the European Patent Convention, and includes a comparative analysis of key jurisdictions. Another chapter examines the UPC and Unitary Patent reform packages. The book provides a lot of practical information in its examination of litigation in the UK, Germany, France and the Netherlands.
In Chapter 4, the author reports on a survey of the UP/UPC-interested legal and business communities. Interviewees were predominately UK-focused. Here a discussion on renewal fees, perhaps one of the more interesting economic levers of the UP, suggests that the community prefers renewal fees to be set at the equivalent of three member states existing fees (namely the UK, Germany and France.) However, this view was not unanimous, as one interview noted that, "her company 'would like to see a higher renewal fee because higher fees discourage spurious patenting.'"
[Merpel thinks this interviewee is very economics-friendly.] Other sections address trolls and forum shopping, the opt-out and SMEs.
At the time of writing, the
UK IPO has not changed its stance on the UPC. Time will tell.
European Patent Litigation in the Shadow of the Unified Patent Court, by McDonagh, Luke. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016. ISBN: 978 1 78471 473 4. Available
here for £70. Rupture factor: Low, a back-friendly 200 pages.
Disclosure: In my previous role at the UK IPO, I was involved in the underlying research project discussed in the final chapter.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar